Deal Story
HomeNotesMacro
Macro

Dollar Hegemony ② — Understanding the Plumbing

Repo markets, the Fed balance sheet, Treasury TGA — dollar hegemony is sustained not by geopolitics but by liquidity plumbing. We dissect how the 2019 repo crisis and the Kevin Warsh era are rewiring this system.

2026-05-28·20 min read·12 sources

Key Takeaways

  • The repo market is dollar hegemony's plumbing — global financial institutions borrow short-term dollars using US Treasuries as collateral
  • The Fed balance sheet expanded from $900B (2007) to $9 trillion (2022) — this faucet determines global dollar liquidity
  • September 2019: QT pushed too far and repo rates spiked from 2% to 10% in a single day — the day the pipes clogged
  • The Treasury General Account (TGA) quietly moves market liquidity independently of the Fed
  • Kevin Warsh: aggressive QT + rules-based policy → a new phase of dollar tightening, hitting emerging markets and the Korean won directly
01

The Plumbing — How the Repo Market Distributes Dollars

The force sustaining dollar hegemony is not military power or economic scale. It's plumbing.

The market where global financial institutions borrow and lend trillions of dollars overnight — this is the repo market (Repurchase Agreement market). The mechanics are simple:

① A sells a US Treasury to B
② Simultaneously, A promises to repurchase the same Treasury at a slightly higher price tomorrow (or on a set date)
③ The price difference = the repo rate = interest

From B's perspective, it's a one-day collateralized loan. From A's perspective, it's pledging Treasuries to borrow cash. The global repo market exceeds $10 trillion in estimated size.

The critical factor is collateral quality. The most preferred collateral in this market is the US Treasury — virtually zero credit risk, extremely high liquidity. In other words, you need US Treasuries to borrow dollars. This is how dollar hegemony is maintained through plumbing.

Repo Market Size

~$10T+ (daily volume)

US domestic alone: $4–5T. Including global: exceeds $10T

Preferred Collateral

US Treasuries

Top-tier collateral — near-zero credit risk, maximum liquidity

Typical Tenor

Mainly overnight (1 day)

One-day trades rolled daily — effectively short-term funding infrastructure

Why Treasuries Are Collateral — Dollar Hegemony's Circular Logic

Because the dollar is the reserve currency, Treasuries become the premier collateral. Because Treasuries are premier collateral, everyone wants to hold them. Because demand is structurally high, the US borrows at low rates. That borrowing sustains dollar supply. As long as this loop holds, dollar hegemony self-reinforces.

02

The Fed Balance Sheet — The Dollar Faucet

The Federal Reserve is the institution that creates dollars. But the way it supplies dollars is far more complex than simply 'printing.' The key is the balance sheet.

How QE (Quantitative Easing) works:
The Fed buys Treasuries from the market → pays for them with bank reserves → dollars enter the economy.

How QT (Quantitative Tightening) works:
The Fed lets Treasuries mature without reinvesting, or actively sells → Treasuries return to the market → bank reserves shrink → dollar liquidity in the economy contracts.

Before the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed's balance sheet was approximately $900 billion. At its 2022 peak, it reached $9 trillion — a 10× expansion in just 14 years.

Federal Reserve Total Assets (2007–2024, USD Trillions)

Source: Federal Reserve H.4.1 Statistical Release. After the $9T peak in 2022, QT has reduced assets to ~$7.2T. Note the temporary reversal around the 2019 repo crisis.

QE's Paradox — Buying Treasuries Reduces Collateral

When the Fed buys Treasuries via QE, dollar reserves in the system increase. But simultaneously, repo market collateral (Treasuries) decreases. Liquidity rises but the fuel that runs the plumbing shrinks. This is where the paradox emerges: QT actually increases repo collateral — but if it goes too fast, reserve shortages trigger a crisis.

03

The Treasury TGA — The Liquidity Variable Nobody Talks About

The Fed isn't the only variable moving dollar liquidity. The Treasury General Account (TGA) quietly moves markets.

The TGA is the checking account the US Treasury holds at the Fed. Tax receipts and bond issuance flow in; government spending flows out. Simple in principle — but changes in this balance directly impact market liquidity:

- TGA balance falls → government spending increases → dollars enter the economy → liquidity rises (easing effect)
- TGA balance rises → bond issuance or spending cuts → dollars absorbed from economy → liquidity falls (tightening effect)

Debt Ceiling Negotiations and the TGA Liquidity Cycle

PhaseSituationTGA ChangeMarket LiquidityMarket Effect
Debt ceiling hit — no new issuanceTGA balance fallsSupply increasesEasing (equities ↑)
Debt ceiling deal reachedTGA refill beginsSupply decreasesTightening (equities ↓ possible)
Large Treasury issuance (catching up)TGA surgesLarge-scale absorptionStrong tightening shock
Normalization — regular spending resumesTGA gradually fallsNormalizedNeutral

After the June 2023 debt ceiling resolution, the Treasury issued approximately $1 trillion in bonds within three months to refill the TGA, sharply draining market liquidity — one of the hidden drivers behind the rate surge in H2 2023.

04

The 2019 Repo Crisis — The Day the Pipes Clogged

Tuesday morning, September 17, 2019. The US repo market froze.

Overnight repo rates that had been hovering around 2% surged to 10% during the morning session — five times higher than the prior day, more than four times the Fed's upper policy rate (2.25%). The world's largest short-term funding market nearly seized up.

2019 Repo Crisis — Rates Surged to 10% in a Single Day

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, GCF Repo rate (pre-SOFR). On September 17–18, 2019, repo rates spiked to ~10% annualized before the Fed intervened with overnight repo operations.

Two events collided simultaneously:

Corporate tax payment deadline — Large corporations drained cash from banks to pay taxes, rapidly depleting bank reserves
Treasury auction settlement — Large-scale Treasury issuance settlement absorbed cash from the system

When the two hit together, bank reserves fell below the critical threshold. Banks unwilling to lend in repo pulled back — and rates exploded.

The Fed immediately launched a $75 billion overnight repo operation the next day, continuing interventions for months. In October 2019, it began purchasing $60 billion in T-bills monthly. Chair Powell called this "NOT QE" — but it was effectively a mini-QE.

The lesson: QT has a hard floor. When reserves fall below a certain level, the plumbing clogs. To prevent recurrence, the Fed established the Standing Repo Facility (SRF) in 2021.

05

The Dollar Supply Paradox — More Debt Means Better Plumbing

Now we return to the core question from Part 1: why does the world keep buying US Treasuries even as the total exceeds $36 trillion?

Through the plumbing lens, the paradox dissolves.

More US debt issuance → more collateral in the repo market → smoother global short-term dollar funding → more dollar demand → stronger dollar hegemony. Growing debt doesn't weaken dollar hegemony — the mechanism actually reinforces it.

This is what the Triffin Dilemma looks like translated into plumbing language. As the reserve currency issuer, the US is structurally required to run current account and fiscal deficits to supply the world with dollars (= liquidity). The very act of supplying dollars means accumulating debt. And that debt (Treasuries) becomes the fuel for the repo market, regenerating dollar demand.

The dollar paradox: US debt is the fuel of the global financial system. If the debt disappeared, so would the plumbing.

06

Kevin Warsh — A New Plumber Takes Over

In 2026, Kevin Warsh was nominated as Fed Chair — a former Fed Governor (2006–2011) and JP Morgan investment banker. Trump's choice.

Warsh matters because his monetary policy philosophy differs fundamentally from Powell's.

Rules-Based Monetary Policy

Minimize discretionary decisions

Prefers formal guidelines like the Taylor Rule. Critical of the Fed's 'discretionary' policy approach

Aggressive QT

Accelerate balance sheet reduction

"The Fed balance sheet is too large." Favors faster Treasury runoff than Powell

Tension with Trump

Rate-cut pressure vs. inflation control

Trump wants rate cuts; Warsh is cautious about inflation re-acceleration — potential Fed independence friction

Warsh's direct impact on dollar liquidity:

Faster QT → More Treasuries in market (more repo collateral) + shrinking bank reserves → upward pressure on short rates → global dollar liquidity tightening

Long-term rates → Rising Treasury supply + inflation fears → higher 10-year yields possible → dollar strengthening pressure

One irony: if aggressive QT drains bank reserves too quickly — another 2019 repo crisis could emerge. Warsh knows this risk, and the SRF (Standing Repo Facility) provides a backstop — but where exactly the critical threshold lies will be tested in real time.

07

Global Investor Perspective — Where the Plumbing Pressure Leaks

When the dollar liquidity plumbing tightens, pressure leaks at the weakest link. In global financial markets, those weak links are emerging market assets and short-term dollar funding markets.

Cross-Currency Basis Swaps (CCBS): One of the most precise gauges of stress in dollar hegemony's plumbing — the 'premium' non-dollar institutions pay to borrow dollars short-term. Near zero in normal times; spikes during QT overshoot or crisis. During the 2008 financial crisis, the JPY CCBS reached -100bp. EUR hit -70bp. The wider this spread, the more dollar borrowing costs exceed the policy rate benchmark.

EM capital flows: When the Fed runs QT, markets shift into risk-off mode — capital exits EM equities and bonds and flows into US Treasuries. This is what the 'Dollar Smile' theory describes: the dollar strengthens when the US economy is very strong and when it's very weak. Emerging market currencies sit on the other side of that smile.

The Warsh regime's global impact: Aggressive QT + rules-based policy increases market predictability but reduces dollar liquidity flexibility. If the Fed's room for 'discretionary' intervention narrows in a crisis, EMs face faster and deeper dollar funding stress. The countries first in line — Turkey without a swap line, Argentina with heavy dollar debt, Russia under sanctions — feel the plumbing crack earliest.

Next: Can Dedollarization Actually Happen?

With plumbing this tightly woven, is dedollarization actually happening? BRICS, yuan, mBridge — declarations overflow but the infrastructure reality is sobering. Part 3 dissects the real state of dedollarization.

References

  1. [1]Federal Reserve. H.4.1 Factors Affecting Reserve Balances of Depository Institutions. Federal Reserve Statistical Release, 2024.
  2. [2]Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Repo and Reverse Repo Operations. FRBNY Open Market Operations, 2024.
  3. [3]Pozsar, Z.. Global Money Notes — Repo Market Series. Credit Suisse / Formerly at Credit Suisse, 2019.(레포시장 구조 분석의 권위적 자료)
  4. [4]Bagehot, W.. Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market. Henry S. King & Co., 1873.(중앙은행 최후 대부자 원칙의 원전 — 레포 위기 이해의 이론적 기초)
  5. [5]Copeland, A., Martin, A., & Walker, M.. Repo Runs: Evidence from the Tri-Party Repo Market. Journal of Finance, 69(6), 2014.
  6. [6]Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Statement Regarding Repurchase Operations (September 2019). FRBNY Markets Group, 2019.
  7. [7]Afonso, G., Cipriani, M., Copeland, A., et al.. The Market Events of Mid-September 2019. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 918, 2020.
  8. [8]Duffie, D. & Krishnamurthy, A.. Passthrough Efficiency in the Fed's New Monetary Policy Setting. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Jackson Hole Proceedings, 2016.
  9. [9]Bernanke, B.. The New Tools of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review, 110(4), 2020.
  10. [10]Warsh, K.. Deregulation and Its Discontents: A Dissent from the Fed. Wall Street Journal Op-Ed, 2011.(워시의 통화정책 철학 이해를 위한 1차 자료)
  11. [11]Krishnamurthy, A. & Vissing-Jorgensen, A.. The Aggregate Demand for Treasury Debt. Journal of Political Economy, 120(2), 2012.
  12. [12]한국은행 (Bank of Korea). 한국의 외환시장 개입 및 FX 스왑라인 운용. 한국은행 조사통계월보, 2024.
Dollar Hegemony ② — Understanding the Plumbing | Notes | Deal Story | Deal Story